Tell SBUSD: Reign in the rampant use of screens!
A campaign from Pencils Not Pixels in Santa Barbara
Sign This Campaign
Why This Matters
A growing number of educators, parents, students, researchers, and community members across the country -- and right here in Santa Barbara! -- are urging school districts to rethink and reign in the rampant use of screens inside the classroom. Creating real change requires organizing, showing up, and making our voices impossible to ignore. WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Help us ensure that Santa Barbara Unified School District -- into which schools from Goleta and Hope District also funnel -- follows the lead of our neighbors in Los Angeles. It is there that the board of the nation's second-largest school district just recently passed a historic classroom screen use resolution. When implemented this fall, it will set hard time limits by grade level; block YouTube, gaming platforms, and other recreational apps; eliminate devices for the youngest students; require weekly screentime reports to parents; and much more.
Santa Barbara school board members are expected to soon vote on a similar resolution, also to be implemented this fall. Public consensus is growing and LAUSD has shown it can be done. The time to act is NOW on what the data and evidence make clear about the academic, emotional, and physical harms linked to excessive screen time. Our kids, and our community, need not wait any longer. Please join us in telling SBUSD’s board that our community is paying attention and demanding immediate action and ***SIGN THIS PETITION!***
- Commit to developing and implementing practices and policies within the general guideline of “intentional technology.” Intentional technology can be easily understood as “Less is more, later is better, relationships and skills before screens.” It prioritizes not devices but dialogue, face-to-face collaboration, and hands-on instruction and learning, returning human interaction to the default starting point. It is using technology to add unique value to a specific learning objective only after it’s been impartially proven to provide learning transfer in ways other modalities (such as paper and pen) cannot.
- Block all recreational, non-educational platforms on district devices. Prohibit student access to YouTube, social media, gaming platforms, and other recreational apps during the school day. While teachers may retain the ability to use appropriate video content for instruction, unsupervised student access has no place on school grounds.
- End device use during unstructured time. Prohibit device use during passing periods, lunch, and recess for elementary and middle school students. These unstructured moments are critical for free play, reflection, and physical, social, and emotional development -- time that screens steal away.
- Encourage paper, physical textbooks, and off-screen homework. Research consistently shows better comprehension and retention with print materials. Educators should pursue analog alternatives during class time and assign homework that doesn’t require the use of a permanent 1:1 device until at least high school.
- Set specific, enforceable screen time limits by grade level. Establish clear daily and weekly maximums for student screen use on district devices, with less screen use for younger students.
- Reduce 1:1 device programs and eliminate devices for the youngest students. Remove digital devices from early education through 2nd grade classrooms, except where required for mandated assessments, and transition to shared laptop carts and computer labs for upper elementary. If 1:1 devices are to be used by middle school students, they must be kept on campus and/or disabled off campus.
- Provide parents with meaningful opt-out rights and transparency. Allow families to opt out of EdTech programs individually or entirely without penalty, and ensure analog alternatives are always available. Share weekly reports on student screen activity on district devices.
- Evaluate all EdTech contracts for educational value and student data privacy. Require independent third-party review of EdTech products. Do not rely solely on vendor-supplied research. Ensure student data is protected and that contracts include strong and enforceable accountability mechanisms. When school-issued devices are used, they must be safe -- as in lacking features likely to cause harm to students, including but not limited to addictive design elements, inappropriate content exposure, or predatory data collection. And the products and services accessed via these devices must be effective -- as in independently verified to provide superior learning, knowledge and skill acquisition above and beyond non-digital and not-online methods.
- Distinguish between "TechEd" and "EdTech," terms that sound similar but have very different goals. In TechEd, the focus is on helping students learn how technology works -- technology (such as coding) is the content being taught. With EdTech, by contrast, technology is the tool to teach any subject. What we’re addressing here is EdTech, of course, not TechEd.
Recent Supporters
-
about 8 hours ago
William Hawthorne
Parent
-
about 22 hours ago
Jen Newman
Parent
-
1 day ago
Rocio Angeles
Parent