Petition for Intentional Technology Use in SMUSD Schools

A campaign from SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech

Sign This Campaign

547
Signatures
547 of 550 signatures
99% to goal
Every action matters
School Details

2025-2026 school year

Adding school details helps us track participation by school. Grade level is optional, but can be helpful for certain campaigns.

You may receive email updates about this campaign from SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech

Recent supporters:
Janelle Ruiz 3 days ago Erin Packard 3 days ago Christine Domingo 3 days ago

Why This Matters

Concerns about technology in schools have become a defining issue in education fueled by a growing body of evidence showing students do not learn well from screens. School districts across the country, including LAUSD, are responding by adopting more intentional and evidence-based approaches, driven in no small part by parents organizing and asking for change.

We deeply appreciate SMUSD's recognition that change is needed and their commitment to the creation of a Human-Centered Technology Plan, but the timeline is unacceptable. The consultants hired by the district will not present their strategic plan to the district until the spring of next year. And only then will the district develop an implementation plan.

The petition below calls on the district to move forward in time to impact the 2026 / 2027 school year and to ensure that the plan's scope reflects the full weight of the evidence.

Please sign and share widely! And join us at www.SMUSDParentsforIntentionalTech.org

Sincerely,
SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech

UPDATE (6/3) - We easily surpassed our initial goal of 500 signatures. We plan to officially present the petition to the board and district at the next board meeting on June 18th. We'll continue to collect signatures until then! Thank you to everyone who has signed and shared!

 
Dear Dr. Johnsen, Dr. Campbell and San Marcos Unified Board Members,
We are parents and community members concerned about the growing overreliance on screen-based learning in our public schools, and we are asking San Marcos Unified to take action.

Despite the massive level of investment in edtech programs and 1:1 devices, test scores in our district and across the country have been declining for over a decade. Literacy rates are at historic lows. Students are struggling with executive function. Extreme behaviors are on the rise. The achievement gap is widening. At the same time, students are less digitally literate than the generation before them.

The lack of independent, peer-reviewed research for edtech programs like iReady is concerning. Meanwhile, research shows that comprehension and retention improve when working on paper. Internet-connected devices fragment attention and pull teachers away from teaching toward monitoring online behavior. Most edtech programs collect student data, gamify learning in ways that undermine deep thinking, and have not demonstrated that they meaningfully improve outcomes at scale.

Districts across the country are taking action. Los Angeles Unified, the 2nd largest school district in the country, recently passed a landmark resolution committing to an intentional technology policy with specific limits. We are asking San Marcos Unified to do the same.

We appreciate the district's commitment to developing a Human-Centered Technology Plan and see it as an important step in the right direction. But our students cannot afford to wait. We urge the district to move forward in time to impact the 2026 / 2027 school year and to ensure that the plan's scope reflects the full weight of the evidence.

The following requests are grounded in evidence and offered in a spirit of collaboration. Our goal is not to eliminate technology, but to ensure the way technology is used in SMUSD is intentional, transparent, age-appropriate, and in the best interests of our students.

Our Requests
We, the undersigned, call on San Marcos Unified to adopt the following reforms during the 2026 / 2027 school year:

1. Embrace a Fundamental Shift in Approach to Technology
We are asking the district to take a more cautious, evidence-based approach to technology in our schools. Every tool adopted should serve a clear instructional purpose, demonstrate meaningful efficacy via independent research vs. existing methodologies, and not simply follow trends or prioritize convenience. We ask the district to:
  • Adopt a policy requiring that any new technology used for learning be independently demonstrated as safe and meaningfully effective before it is introduced in classrooms
  • Establish a district-wide culture that defaults to physical books, paper, hands-on materials and off-screen homework whenever feasible, reserving devices for tasks where digital tools offer a clear, evidence-backed advantage over traditional methods
2. Reduce Unnecessary Screen Exposure
Excessive and poorly structured screen time poses documented risks to children's development, attention, and well-being. We ask the district to:
  • Discontinue use of Chromebooks and iPads in grades TK–2, except where required for student assessment
  • Return to a shared device or cart model in grades 3–8, with optional checkout available as needed
  • Prohibit the recreational use of school-issued devices during free time, lunch, and recess, and prohibit their use as a reward or incentive. Unstructured time supports social development and should not be replaced by screen time. District devices are learning tools and not entertainment
  • Restrict the use of overly gamified apps that prioritize engagement and time-on-platform over substantive learning outcomes (e.g. Prodigy)
  • Consider offering low-tech alternatives and/or pathways for families who request them and clearly inform parents of their availability
3. Establish Smarter Guardrails
Stronger safeguards are needed to ensure that technology is used safely, appropriately and responsibly. We ask the district to:
  • Set clear daily or weekly screen time guidelines and best practices, and define permitted uses by grade span. All policies should include appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities
  • Adopt a "safe list" model for elementary and middle schools, where only pre-approved sites and tools are accessible vs. relying on block lists
  • Block student-directed access to non-educational platforms including YouTube, social media, and gaming sites across all district devices and networks
  • Require that all apps used for instruction or on school-issued devices be completely free of advertising
4. Conduct a Comprehensive Curriculum and Program Review
Given that the majority of edtech programs are not supported by independent research demonstrating improved student outcomes at scale, we ask the district to:
  • Discontinue iReady. There is no independent research demonstrating its efficacy at scale, its value as a diagnostic is questionable, it is subject to an ongoing lawsuit regarding student privacy violations, and it has negatively impacted students' learning enjoyment
  • Audit and publish a list of all current edtech contracts, analyze usage data, and only retain tools with demonstrated impact that justifies their cost and cannot be replicated through traditional methods
  • Adopt a formal digital literacy curriculum that builds genuine, transferable skills and includes an honest treatment of AI that addresses what it is, how it works, its risks, ethical implications, and environmental costs
5. Increase Transparency and Family Awareness
Families should have visibility into what tools their children are using and how their data is being handled. We ask the district to:
  • Publish and maintain a list of all edtech programs approved for use by grade level, and update it each school year
  • Provide parents with access to detailed reports on their child's screen activity on district-issued devices, reflecting use throughout the school day rather than only after school hours
  • Require explicit parental consent for each application that collects student data, in accordance with current FTC guidelines on COPPA
  • Require disclosure when generative AI is used in student assessment or evaluation, and obtain explicit student and/or parental consent before AI is used to grade or assess student work
6. Support Teachers Through The Transition
None of these changes will succeed without meaningful investment in our teaching staff. We ask the district to:
  • Provide teachers with relevant professional development, updated instructional materials, and dedicated planning time to navigate these changes confidently and effectively
  • Ensure that no teacher is left without the tools and support needed to succeed under any new policy direction
The evidence is clear, and public consensus is growing. Other districts, including LAUSD, have already taken meaningful steps in this direction. We respectfully call on San Marcos Unified to do the same. The time to act is now to protect the development and academic success of our students

Respectfully,
The Undersigned

Recent Supporters

  • Janelle Ruiz

    Parent

    3 days ago
  • Erin Packard

    Parent

    3 days ago
  • Christine Domingo

    Supporter

    3 days ago
547 supporters have signed this campaign

Share This Campaign

*Separate multiple emails with commas

Need to share on your social networks or via text? Copy this link and paste it into your message.
QR Code for Campaign: Petition for Intentional Technology Use in SMUSD Schools

Community Impact

Families across 19 schools are joining this movement

547
Families Represented
16
Schools
PreK-12
Grade Range
School Grade Count
Paloma Elementary
33 total students
Grade PreK 7
Grade K 4
Grade 1 4
Grade 2 2
Grade 3 4
Grade 4 4
Grade 5 2
Grade not listed 6
Twin Oaks Elementary
13 total students
Grade PreK 1
Grade K 2
Grade 2 4
Grade 3 1
Grade 5 1
Grade not listed 4
Double Peak
76 total students
Grade PreK 5
Grade K 6
Grade 1 7
Grade 2 10
Grade 3 12
Grade 4 5
Grade 5 2
Grade 6 10
Grade 7 2
Grade 8 3
Grade not listed 14
Discovery Elementary
53 total students
Grade PreK 3
Grade K 7
Grade 1 11
Grade 2 4
Grade 3 7
Grade 4 3
Grade 5 5
Grade 6 1
Grade not listed 12
La Costa Meadows Elementary
21 total students
Grade PreK 3
Grade K 2
Grade 2 7
Grade 3 2
Grade 5 5
Grade not listed 2
Richland Elementary
5 total students
Grade PreK 1
Grade 2 1
Grade 3 1
Grade 5 1
Grade not listed 1
Woodland Park Middle
9 total students
Grade 6 4
Grade 7 1
Grade 8 2
Grade not listed 2
Mission Hills High
19 total students
Grade 9 7
Grade 10 4
Grade 11 5
Grade 12 1
Grade not listed 2
San Elijo Elementary
149 total students
Grade PreK 5
Grade K 19
Grade 1 16
Grade 2 18
Grade 3 20
Grade 4 22
Grade 5 11
Grade not listed 38
San Marcos Middle
4 total students
Grade 6 2
Grade 7 1
Grade 8 1
Carrillo Elementary
23 total students
Grade PreK 1
Grade K 1
Grade 1 2
Grade 2 3
Grade 3 4
Grade 4 4
Grade 5 3
Grade not listed 5
San Elijo Middle
46 total students
Grade 6 20
Grade 7 7
Grade 8 9
Grade not listed 10
San Marcos High
25 total students
Grade 9 3
Grade 10 5
Grade 11 4
Grade 12 1
Grade not listed 12
La Mirada Academy
5 total students
Grade 5 2
Grade 7 1
Grade 8 1
Grade not listed 1
Knob Hill Elementary
9 total students
Grade K 1
Grade 1 2
Grade 2 1
Grade 3 1
Grade 4 1
Grade 5 1
Grade not listed 2
San Marcos Elementary
3 total students
Grade K 1
Grade 5 2
547 supporters have signed this campaign