Petition for Intentional Technology Use in SMUSD Schools
A campaign from SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech
Sign This Campaign
Why This Matters
Concerns about technology in schools have become a defining issue in education fueled by a growing body of evidence showing students do not learn well from screens. School districts across the country, including LAUSD, are responding by adopting more intentional and evidence-based approaches, driven in no small part by parents organizing and asking for change.
We deeply appreciate SMUSD's recognition that change is needed and their commitment to the creation of a Human-Centered Technology Plan, but the timeline is unacceptable. The consultants hired by the district will not present their strategic plan to the district until the spring of next year. And only then will the district develop an implementation plan.
The petition below calls on the district to move forward in time to impact the 2026 / 2027 school year and to ensure that the plan's scope reflects the full weight of the evidence.
Please sign and share widely! And join us at www.SMUSDParentsforIntentionalTech.org
Sincerely,
SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech
UPDATE (6/3) - We easily surpassed our initial goal of 500 signatures. We plan to officially present the petition to the board and district at the next board meeting on June 18th. We'll continue to collect signatures until then! Thank you to everyone who has signed and shared!
Despite the massive level of investment in edtech programs and 1:1 devices, test scores in our district and across the country have been declining for over a decade. Literacy rates are at historic lows. Students are struggling with executive function. Extreme behaviors are on the rise. The achievement gap is widening. At the same time, students are less digitally literate than the generation before them.
The lack of independent, peer-reviewed research for edtech programs like iReady is concerning. Meanwhile, research shows that comprehension and retention improve when working on paper. Internet-connected devices fragment attention and pull teachers away from teaching toward monitoring online behavior. Most edtech programs collect student data, gamify learning in ways that undermine deep thinking, and have not demonstrated that they meaningfully improve outcomes at scale.
Districts across the country are taking action. Los Angeles Unified, the 2nd largest school district in the country, recently passed a landmark resolution committing to an intentional technology policy with specific limits. We are asking San Marcos Unified to do the same.
We appreciate the district's commitment to developing a Human-Centered Technology Plan and see it as an important step in the right direction. But our students cannot afford to wait. We urge the district to move forward in time to impact the 2026 / 2027 school year and to ensure that the plan's scope reflects the full weight of the evidence.
The following requests are grounded in evidence and offered in a spirit of collaboration. Our goal is not to eliminate technology, but to ensure the way technology is used in SMUSD is intentional, transparent, age-appropriate, and in the best interests of our students.
Our Requests
We, the undersigned, call on San Marcos Unified to adopt the following reforms during the 2026 / 2027 school year:
1. Embrace a Fundamental Shift in Approach to Technology
- Adopt a policy requiring that any new technology used for learning be independently demonstrated as safe and meaningfully effective before it is introduced in classrooms
- Establish a district-wide culture that defaults to physical books, paper, hands-on materials and off-screen homework whenever feasible, reserving devices for tasks where digital tools offer a clear, evidence-backed advantage over traditional methods
- Discontinue use of Chromebooks and iPads in grades TK–2, except where required for student assessment
- Return to a shared device or cart model in grades 3–8, with optional checkout available as needed
- Prohibit the recreational use of school-issued devices during free time, lunch, and recess, and prohibit their use as a reward or incentive. Unstructured time supports social development and should not be replaced by screen time. District devices are learning tools and not entertainment
- Restrict the use of overly gamified apps that prioritize engagement and time-on-platform over substantive learning outcomes (e.g. Prodigy)
- Consider offering low-tech alternatives and/or pathways for families who request them and clearly inform parents of their availability
- Set clear daily or weekly screen time guidelines and best practices, and define permitted uses by grade span. All policies should include appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities
- Adopt a "safe list" model for elementary and middle schools, where only pre-approved sites and tools are accessible vs. relying on block lists
- Block student-directed access to non-educational platforms including YouTube, social media, and gaming sites across all district devices and networks
- Require that all apps used for instruction or on school-issued devices be completely free of advertising
- Discontinue iReady. There is no independent research demonstrating its efficacy at scale, its value as a diagnostic is questionable, it is subject to an ongoing lawsuit regarding student privacy violations, and it has negatively impacted students' learning enjoyment
- Audit and publish a list of all current edtech contracts, analyze usage data, and only retain tools with demonstrated impact that justifies their cost and cannot be replicated through traditional methods
- Adopt a formal digital literacy curriculum that builds genuine, transferable skills and includes an honest treatment of AI that addresses what it is, how it works, its risks, ethical implications, and environmental costs
- Publish and maintain a list of all edtech programs approved for use by grade level, and update it each school year
- Provide parents with access to detailed reports on their child's screen activity on district-issued devices, reflecting use throughout the school day rather than only after school hours
- Require explicit parental consent for each application that collects student data, in accordance with current FTC guidelines on COPPA
- Require disclosure when generative AI is used in student assessment or evaluation, and obtain explicit student and/or parental consent before AI is used to grade or assess student work
- Provide teachers with relevant professional development, updated instructional materials, and dedicated planning time to navigate these changes confidently and effectively
- Ensure that no teacher is left without the tools and support needed to succeed under any new policy direction
Respectfully,
Recent Supporters
-
3 days ago
Janelle Ruiz
Parent
-
3 days ago
Erin Packard
Parent
-
3 days ago
Christine Domingo
Supporter
Sign This Campaign
Community Impact
Families across 19 schools are joining this movement
| School | Grade | Count |
|---|---|---|
|
Paloma Elementary
33 total students
|
Grade PreK | 7 |
| Grade K | 4 | |
| Grade 1 | 4 | |
| Grade 2 | 2 | |
| Grade 3 | 4 | |
| Grade 4 | 4 | |
| Grade 5 | 2 | |
| Grade not listed | 6 | |
|
Twin Oaks Elementary
13 total students
|
Grade PreK | 1 |
| Grade K | 2 | |
| Grade 2 | 4 | |
| Grade 3 | 1 | |
| Grade 5 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 4 | |
|
Double Peak
76 total students
|
Grade PreK | 5 |
| Grade K | 6 | |
| Grade 1 | 7 | |
| Grade 2 | 10 | |
| Grade 3 | 12 | |
| Grade 4 | 5 | |
| Grade 5 | 2 | |
| Grade 6 | 10 | |
| Grade 7 | 2 | |
| Grade 8 | 3 | |
| Grade not listed | 14 | |
|
Discovery Elementary
53 total students
|
Grade PreK | 3 |
| Grade K | 7 | |
| Grade 1 | 11 | |
| Grade 2 | 4 | |
| Grade 3 | 7 | |
| Grade 4 | 3 | |
| Grade 5 | 5 | |
| Grade 6 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 12 | |
|
La Costa Meadows Elementary
21 total students
|
Grade PreK | 3 |
| Grade K | 2 | |
| Grade 2 | 7 | |
| Grade 3 | 2 | |
| Grade 5 | 5 | |
| Grade not listed | 2 | |
|
Richland Elementary
5 total students
|
Grade PreK | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 | |
| Grade 3 | 1 | |
| Grade 5 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 1 | |
|
Woodland Park Middle
9 total students
|
Grade 6 | 4 |
| Grade 7 | 1 | |
| Grade 8 | 2 | |
| Grade not listed | 2 | |
|
Mission Hills High
19 total students
|
Grade 9 | 7 |
| Grade 10 | 4 | |
| Grade 11 | 5 | |
| Grade 12 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 2 | |
|
San Elijo Elementary
149 total students
|
Grade PreK | 5 |
| Grade K | 19 | |
| Grade 1 | 16 | |
| Grade 2 | 18 | |
| Grade 3 | 20 | |
| Grade 4 | 22 | |
| Grade 5 | 11 | |
| Grade not listed | 38 | |
|
San Marcos Middle
4 total students
|
Grade 6 | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 1 | |
| Grade 8 | 1 | |
|
Carrillo Elementary
23 total students
|
Grade PreK | 1 |
| Grade K | 1 | |
| Grade 1 | 2 | |
| Grade 2 | 3 | |
| Grade 3 | 4 | |
| Grade 4 | 4 | |
| Grade 5 | 3 | |
| Grade not listed | 5 | |
|
San Elijo Middle
46 total students
|
Grade 6 | 20 |
| Grade 7 | 7 | |
| Grade 8 | 9 | |
| Grade not listed | 10 | |
|
San Marcos High
25 total students
|
Grade 9 | 3 |
| Grade 10 | 5 | |
| Grade 11 | 4 | |
| Grade 12 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 12 | |
|
La Mirada Academy
5 total students
|
Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 1 | |
| Grade 8 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 1 | |
|
Knob Hill Elementary
9 total students
|
Grade K | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 2 | |
| Grade 2 | 1 | |
| Grade 3 | 1 | |
| Grade 4 | 1 | |
| Grade 5 | 1 | |
| Grade not listed | 2 | |
|
San Marcos Elementary
3 total students
|
Grade K | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |